Experiments
This index collects the framework's experiments and applied examples. Each page describes its stated data, method, and status tags. Reported figures are not independent validation unless the supporting data and analysis are available for review.
The experiments cover both operational modes. Mode A experiments reconcile two measurements of the same system across observer frames. Mode B experiments propose audits of sub-threshold residuals; whether they recover a signal must be established against the source data.
Classical-calibration experiments
| Experiment | Mode | Dataset | Tag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hubble tension projection | Mode A | Planck CMB + SH0ES distance ladder | Derived · Fitted |
| ΛCDM cosmic budget | Mode A | Planck CMB + SH0ES | Fitted |
| GW150914 dual-readout audit | Mode A | LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA GWOSC strain telemetry | Derived |
| NEO 2019 OK sub-threshold recovery | Mode B | Optical survey archival residuals | Derived · Fitted |
Calibration tool
A specific calibration tool for researchers who want to test their own declared frames against the framework's predicted floor and scope. An extended application of the classical-calibration experiments.
| Tool | Mode | Scope | Tag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cosmoastro floor-scope calibration | Inverse | Cosmological / astronomical frames — reader-supplied anchors | Derived · Frame-Conditioned |
Further Dev
Inferred extensions of the framework's structure to domains outside its verified scope. Every page states clearly what is inferred and what is out of scope.
| Page | Coverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Further Dev index | All inferred extensions, including the high-particle-physics application. | Inferred · open |
Figures and visual comparisons
These project-provided figures accompany the applications and experiments. Captions describe their stated subject; a visualization alone does not establish the reported interpretation or result.
Proxima Centauri Mode B recovery
Astronomy · Project-reported HST WFC3/UVIS image comparison.
Proxima super-resolution comparison
Astronomy · Reported raw and enhanced full-field images and core crops.
Pillars of Creation recovery audit
Astronomy · Hubble and Webb comparative demonstration for Messier 16.
Hubble tension: stereoscopic matrix
Cosmology · Reported triangulation and thermal-shadow comparison.
Inverse triangle framework
Geometry · Inverted apex and core-nullset illustration.
Generalized triangle framework
Geometry · Bounded apex and left-right position illustration.
Triangle internal chord network
Geometry · Structural configuration and invariant-node illustration.
Boundary convergence
Geometry · Scale-invariant vector field and fractional-equilibrium illustration.
Structural equivalence
Geometry · Algebraic-boundary and triangulation-space comparison.
Stereoscopic triangulation
Geometry · Pythagorean triangulation illustration for the Hubble-tension proposal.
Three-dimensional vector topology
Geometry · Spatial illustration of forward and inverse vectors.
Cepheid aperture experiment
Distance ladder · Project-reported projection-factor and observer-aperture illustration.
Compact remnant and black-hole aperture
Black holes · Oppenheimer spin-floor, remnant channels, and reported GW150914 mass partition.
Horizon wall and zero-mode fold
Black holes · Horizon-wall and subcoherent-vault simulation.
Spectroherenic horizon geometry
Gravitational waves · Physical and information-scaling comparison for GW151226 and GW150914.
Zero-mode fold extraction
Telemetry · Project-reported comparison of raw sub-threshold telemetry and recovered signal.
NEO asymptotic phase filter
Planetary defense · Reported comparison; lead-time values require reconciliation.
Horizon probing efficiency
Planetary defense · Illustrative standard and accelerated probing-energy curves.
Hurricane rapid-intensification audit
Meteorology · Project-reported comparison for Hortense, Katrina, and Maria.
Hurricane evolution comparison
Meteorology · Reported pressure-residual comparison across historical cases.
Pre-Kyoto hurricane comparison
Meteorology · Project-reported audit panels across the listed years.
Video tracking interface
Sports telemetry · Video-tracking and telemetry interface.
.jpg)
Pitch position visualization
Sports telemetry · Player-position visualization across the pitch.
How the experiments run
Every experiment is an application of the four-step lock. Steps 1 and 2 are shared across all experiments; steps 3 and 4 differ by dataset and mode.
- Step 1 — Pure geometric initialization. Establish the partition invariants: θ = 70.5288°, S₊ = 1/3, S₋ = 2/3, ratio 2.000000. Derived
- Step 2 — Empirical boundary pinning. Declare the dataset's baselines: H₀,A = 67.4 km/s/Mpc for CMB-anchored experiments; specific strain channels and epochs for GWOSC experiments; survey cadence and threshold for archival experiments. Frame-Conditioned
- Step 3 — Thermodynamic aperture coupling. Apply the calibration that maps the declared frame onto the geometric engine. Fitted
- Step 4 — Mode execution. Mode A projects across frames; Mode B mines the conserved complement. Both return to measured values.
The four-step lock is described in full in manual 02. The experiments are the applied demonstrations of that lock on real data.
Cross-references. The values established by each experiment are indexed in the master register. The derivations behind the projection factors and closure identities are in proofs. The operational guides that frame the experiments are in manual 05.